hawkesburyriver

59 photos tagged hawkesburyriver, from 4 members of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

33
1880
2013

 

Where were these photos tagged?

79% of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

A selection of photos tagged hawkesburyriver:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was April 2017.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

Steamer "General Gordon" Hawkesbury River

  • Andy Brill said:
    Another view of the 'General Gordon' berthed on the Hawkesbury River from dunedoo: The steamer is named after General Gordon the ill-fated hero of Khartoum. Here is a contemporary photo of him from 'Life of General Gordon' 1886:
  • beachcomber australia said:
    WooHoo! There she blows! See comments etc ...
  • Australian National Maritime Museum on The Commons said:
    Andy Brill beachcomber australia Thanks guys :)

Bridge over possibly the Hawkesbury River, 1880-1909

  • 4 older comments, and then…
  • Scott Bird said:
    Is that the original one from St Albans (washed away in abt 1889)? Haven't seen any images of that one to verify.
  • Australian National Maritime Museum on The Commons said:
    Scott Bird Hi ozbirdy, this one has had us stumped for a while. There have been suggestions that this may not be the Hawkesbury at all, so for now it remains a mystery. I will enter your suggestion into our database for our records. Hopefully one day we will be able to confidently identify it. :)
  • Julie Hatchlings said:
    Looks more like landscape around Warragemba.
  • beachcomber australia said:
    Another view of the 3-pier-wide bridge - acms.sl.nsw.gov.au/item/itemDetailPaged.aspx?itemID=15130
  • Kip Newing said:
    Possibly this one! www.flickr.com/photos/kipnewing/6201797841/in/set-7215762...

Hawkesbury Station

  • beachcomber australia said:
    At Brooklyn. GoogleMapsSatelliteView - goo.gl/maps/udGqE
  • beachcomber australia said:
    It's noticeable that no-one is posing for this photo, and that the camera is at waist height. I wonder if the photographer was travelling alone, and possibly using a hidden briefcase camera ??