royalflyingcorps

379 photos and 1 illustration tagged royalflyingcorps, from 10 members of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos & illustrations taken?

197
1900
2014

 

Where were these photos & illustrations tagged?

38% of these photos & illustrations are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos & illustrations:

Members using this tag

Photos & Illustrations

Show photos & illustrations photos (379) illustrations (1)

A selection of photos & illustrations tagged royalflyingcorps:

Loading photos & illustrations…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was March 2024.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos & illustrations:

HC00074

  • nancy bruinsma said:
    This house is located at 70 Deseronto road

Sky Pilot and Pilot in the Sky?

  • 41 older comments, and then…
  • Irish251 said:
    Those are Observer rather than pilot’s wings.
  • i-lenticularis (NO GRAPHICS) said:
    Absolutely!
  • National Library of Ireland on The Commons said:
    Irish251 i-lenticularis (NO GRAPHICS) What does an observer do? Observe?
  • Irish251 said:
    National Library of Ireland on The Commons He is the second crewman and would have had a mounted machine-gun, but the title derives, I think, from the Royal Flying Corps' original role which was general reconnaissance and spotting for ground artillery.
  • beachcomber australia said:
    25 January 1918 was a Friday ...

Royal Flying Corps mechanical workshop

  • Swordscookie said:
    At first sight I thought it was a dining room:-) Typical military, everything squared off on shipshape!
  • Provincial Archives of Alberta said:
    I can see that! I get the sense that this workshop was set up as a model and that actual workshops would have been somewhat less tidy.
  • Swordscookie said:
    Provincial Archives of Alberta I would have thought training for aircraft mechanics rather than workshop???? A real workshop would have been a lot less tidy, real work going on:-)
  • Provincial Archives of Alberta said:
    Yes, it probably was for training purposes. However, "workshop" is a good, broad, catch-all term in the absence of further information.