federals

7 photos tagged federals, from 2 members of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

4
1861
2015

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged federals:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was April 2015.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

Federals at Torreon (LOC)

  • swanq said:
    Date written on negative is 3/7/29.
  • swanq said:
    Torreon, in northern Mexico was a scene of much fighting between rebels and federals in 1913-1914 and again in the rebellion of 1929.
  • swanq said:
    www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/atlas_mexico/constitutionalist_re...
    provides a map of Mexico with indicators of military activity by different groups during the "Constitutionalist Revolution" of 1913-1914. Torreon is shown as an area where Federal forces (in support of Huerta while he was president, February 18, 1913 – July 15, 1914) resisted the Revolutionary Army. Pancho Villa was the revolutionary leader who was active around Torreon.

    Other Bain photos of Federal at Torreon include:
    Feds at Torreon (LOC)
    and
    Feds at Torreon (LOC)
  • Jesús Roberto Duarte said:
    la foto 3033-12 (así como otras de distintas fechas) también tiene 3/7/29 (¿marzo 7, de 1929?). Tal vez se trate de la fecha de archivo o de publicación pero no de la toma. Dr. Roberto Duarte.
  • Jesús Roberto Duarte said:
    These three pictures most likely were taken arround April 4, 1914, not at Torreón, but at San Pedro, 62 kilometers north from Torreón. Or at least were taken on April 1-2, before or when the federals were fleeing from Torreón to San Pedro, hustled by Villa's troups. Dr. Roberto Duarte¨ Plastic Surgeon

Federals in action, Mexico City

  • Hector Hugo Lara Hernández said:
    February 9, 1913, Coup dÉtat against president Francisco I Madero by Victoriano Huerta along with following photos

[Union Officer, Second Lieutenant]

  • Brendan said:
    I think this is actually a Union officer
  • John said:
    Yes, it is certainly a junior Union officer, and a very nice tintype.
  • SMU Libraries Digital Collections said:
    John Brendan Thank you both for your interest in this item! You are correct, it is a junior Union officer, specifically a Second Lieutenant in the Union Army. We have made the appropriate changes and have updated our record accordingly. Thank you both again for your interest, and it is always wonderful to hear feedback from such knowledgeable people as yourselves!
  • Brendan said:
    Thank you for the kind words! And thanks most of all for curating and sharing this fantastic collection of images!