danielguggenheim

3 photos tagged danielguggenheim, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

2
1910
1913

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged danielguggenheim:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was April 2012.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

Daniel Guggenheim (LOC)

  • Lú_ said:
    Shot at the same time: www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/3775431272/
  • Betty Berg said:
    Thanks Lu, I knew I had seen this one but kept forgetting to go back to it. It looks like the same session, at a slightly different angle. Pete, the date on this one is on the upper left side, below the white tape about an inch. It is more deteriorated than the other. :(
  • Harry Angstrom said:
    Wikipedia article. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Guggenheim
  • Wystan said:
    Guggenheim was a copper magnate, president of the American Smelting Refining Company. Photo date is inscribed on negative, in reverse: 8-6-[19]13.
  • swanq said:
    This is on board a ship. August 7, 1913 NYT lists Isaac Guggenheim as a passenger on the Imperator. query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9404E0DF123FE633A... Perhaps the journalist got the brothers mixed up, or perhaps both brothers were on board.

Daniel Guggenheim and Ind'l Com'n (LOC)

  • Art Siegel said:
    This appears to be Guggenheim's testimony before the Walsh Commission at New York's City Hall on January 21, 1915. Guggenheim was a copper magnate. Other pictures from the Commission hearings in New York are in the Bain collection: www.flickr.com/search/?w=8623220@N02&q=walsh%20commis... I don't know why the picture is dated 1926. Perhaps it was pulled for another use at that time.
  • Kristi (LOC P&P) said:
    artolog, You're correct - this definitely seems to be a photograph of Guggenheim's testimony before the Walsh Commission. And yes, I think your supposition about the other date on the image reflecting a later usage is correct as well. On January 18, 1926, the date on the photo, Guggenheim was in the news for pledging $2.5 million to then Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover in order to establish the Daniel Guggenheim Fund for the Promotion of Aeronautics. We will update the record to reflect more details - as well as make sure the other images from the Walsh Commission hearings are more accurately labeled. Thanks for your help!
  • Art Siegel said:
    Mystery solved.. and you're welcome.. I've learned a lot from dipping into the Walsh Commission history as a result of LOC's sharing of these photos. There was a lot of rage, anarchy and revolution in the air, and the Commission brought the key players, as well as social and economic thinkers and doers together for a public examination of the ills of Capitalism at the end of the Gilded Age. Though it had no power to do anything, it showed people that we were a democracy where controversial issues could be examined publicly.

Daniel Guggenheim (LOC)

  • 3 older comments, and then…
  • Richard Norton said:
    Daniel Guggenheim (July 9, 1856 – September 28, 1930) was an American industrialist and philanthropist, and a son of Meyer Guggenheim. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Guggenheim
  • Betty Berg said:
    Richard, Thank You for all your input on these photos. It makes them so much more interesting and easy to access for some of us. Have question, There appears to be a date on the lower left edge of this one I can't quite make out. I think it reads __/17/17. Maybe you can make it out . My eyes are to old and tired. Again Thank You.
  • Wystan said:
    I think that date may be 1912. LOC could check on the original negative to be sure. His brother, Benjamin Guggenheim, drowned in the sinking of the Titanic, April 20, 1912.
  • Pete (LOC P&P) said:
    The date is quite hard to read, but I think it's 9/17/1912. Thanks for spotting it, Mona.
  • Betty Berg said:
    No, I thank you. I am honored to participate. However in saying that I have restudied the photo and am convinced the year is 1917. The top of the 7 is too square to be a 2. But the day of the month is rounded, it could be a 12. That 9 is backwards to the other numbers, (it messes with me. ) 9/12/17 looks good to me. Maybe we'll get lucky and find where it was used, and it may remain a mystery. Either way It Is History.. I truly enjoy this stream.