copper

This is the caption that Marion Post Walcott included with her photo from 1939 but the actual damage to the vegetation occurred in the late 1800's. The smelting technology of that time did not allow the sulfur dioxide generated by the heating of the ore to be captured. By 1909 the mining companies developed new practices which let them recover the sulfur dioxide and use it in the manufacture of sulfuric acid.

What does it look like TODAY? Nature is nothing if not resilient!

Photo de Sallaumines

Bunmahon/Bonmahon was a copper mining area. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunmahon Old OSI map shows lots of disused mines. No idea where this new mine could be. maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,642741,598456,7,9 The men are standing on the rickety headstocks, probably salvaged from another mine. One of a pair of winding wheels is lying in the foreground. There is a substantial winding house on the right, with a temporary steam sinking winch. Once the shaft sinkers had got down to the copper seams, more substantial headstocks would be built over the shaft. Here are some coal mine sinkers www.flickr.com/photos/53560486@N04/6221476026/

blackpoolbeach knows a lot more about mining than I do and thank you for the information, it makes sense of the shot. Another example of a health and safety nightmare today but the norm in those days. Theres an awful lot of people standing on a flimsy looking frame. It looks as though this was a new mine about to be opened or an old mine about to be closed. I suspect the former given the condition of the piping on the right foreground. I was looking at the frame and wondering if it could withstand the pull from winch but if you look closely you can see the supports on that side are angled out to brace it against the pull of the winch! Lord how things have changed in 100 years!

The Times (London) of Nov 25 1905 reported a speculative venture to reopen mines at Bunmahon . Could the picture be showing one of these mines in the process of being reopened? The Bonmahon Copper Mines Development Syndicate (Limited) has a capital of £30,000 in £1 shares, of which 12,500 shares are reserved for working capital, and subscriptions are invited for the balance. The company is formed to acquire the mineral and mining rights, free from all royalties and charges, of the Knockmahon and Tankardstown Copper Mines, to reopen the mines, and afterwards (if deemed advisable) to form a larger company to work and develop the property on an adequate scale. The purchase consideration to be paid for the property is £16,250, of which £5,000 is payable in cash and the balance in shares. The venture is frankly speculative, but it is interesting from the point of view of the possible revival of a once important Irish industry, and the present position of the copper market is in its favour. A short youtube clip about one of the Bunmahon mines here.

The venture to reopen the mines seems not to have been a success - the company was wound up in 1907, and the investors, many from the Waterford area, lost their money. There seem to have been big problems removing water from the mines. TheTankardstown mine went a considerable distance under the sea. In 1910 the man behind the attempted reopening, a Mr Herbert Tristman Marks, was criticised in a magazine article, which suggested the prospectus had misled investors. He sued the magazine, lost the case, then lost an appeal, and was then declared bankrupt.

John Spooner Very interesting video. Shaft sinkers were a breed apart. They went up and down shafts in a large bucket until their work was finished. Only then were cages fitted for hauling coal or man-riding. The Hartley Colliery disaster of 1862 brought legislation so that there were 2 shafts to give miners an escape route. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartley_Colliery_Disaster Non-ferrous mines (lead, tin, copper) seemed to be less regulated than coal mines. What is the difference between a well and a mine? With a well you dig a shaft to look for water.

This appears to be Guggenheim's testimony before the Walsh Commission at New York's City Hall on January 21, 1915. Guggenheim was a copper magnate. Other pictures from the Commission hearings in New York are in the Bain collection: www.flickr.com/search/?w=8623220@N02&q=walsh%20commis... I don't know why the picture is dated 1926. Perhaps it was pulled for another use at that time.

artolog, You're correct - this definitely seems to be a photograph of Guggenheim's testimony before the Walsh Commission. And yes, I think your supposition about the other date on the image reflecting a later usage is correct as well. On January 18, 1926, the date on the photo, Guggenheim was in the news for pledging $2.5 million to then Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover in order to establish the Daniel Guggenheim Fund for the Promotion of Aeronautics. We will update the record to reflect more details - as well as make sure the other images from the Walsh Commission hearings are more accurately labeled. Thanks for your help!

Mystery solved.. and you're welcome.. I've learned a lot from dipping into the Walsh Commission history as a result of LOC's sharing of these photos. There was a lot of rage, anarchy and revolution in the air, and the Commission brought the key players, as well as social and economic thinkers and doers together for a public examination of the ills of Capitalism at the end of the Gilded Age. Though it had no power to do anything, it showed people that we were a democracy where controversial issues could be examined publicly.