ballyduff

2 photos tagged ballyduff, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

1918

100% of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Photos tagged ballyduff:

Loading photos…

Enable JavaScript to browse these photos, or see them on flickr.com.

The last upload was October 2025.

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

42 older comments, and then…
DannyM8 said:
Welcome back. There was an English / Prendergast wedding at Ballyduff Church on the 12/06/1918 see Wedding Certificate.
The Priest was Fr. Prendergast, Groom is John English (I saw some of his movies!) Bride is Ellen Christina Prendergast. Witnesses were Michael English and Mary Slattery.
Niall McAuley said:
Hope you had a good break!

I found the same marriage as Danny, but too slow!
Niall McAuley said:
Birth records continue until 1924, I don't see any English/Prendergast babies in Waterford
Niall McAuley said:
Found them in Carrigmore, Clogheen, Tipperary.

Edmund, Thomas, Anne, Eleanor.
National Library of Ireland on The Commons said:
Niall McAuley Not often someone outguns Quickdraw McAuley! Well done, DannyM8...

14 older comments, and then…
Niall McAuley said:
Per Wikipedia, HMS Vivid was the base ship at Devonport, Plymouth from 1912-20, so this sailor was serving at the barracks there.
Niall McAuley said:
I wonder is this could be Michael or Loughlin Cullen, sons of Kate Cullen of Ballyduff per the 1911 census.They would have been 16 to 18.
National Library of Ireland on The Commons said:
Niall McAuley I'm ahead of you, Niall! Replacing a lot of the very early (in our Commons adventure) uploaded photos with higher res images (finally!)...
National Library of Ireland on The Commons said:
Niall McAuley Niall, sorry for leading you slightly astray. The Ballyduff in question was near Kilmeaden in Co. Waterford not Wicklow...
Sharon Corbet said:
There's a Cullen family in 1901 in Ballyduff, but by 1911 they're now the Cullinanes. Bridget Cullen/Cullinane had 9 children, 5 living in 1911, but only a total of 4 turn up in the census. It's possible this is the "missing" one, or that he had died by 1911, and his mother was copying the photo later for some reason.