vhusc

3 photos tagged vhusc, from 2 members of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

2
1936
2006

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged vhusc:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was April 2019.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

Brisbane-Singapore air service (DH 86) advertisement, ca. 1935 / H.B. Green & Co.

  • 3 older comments, and then…
  • beachcomber australia said:
    1934. It seems that "safety" was not really the primary concern, and that QANTAS planes have had accidents: "The D.H.86 had been rushed from design concept to test flight in a record four months to meet the deadlines set by the Australian airmail contracts, and a lot of attention to detail had been ignored. It was a big aircraft for its power, and as a result very lightly built. There was poor response to control movements in certain speed ranges, the wings were inclined to twist badly if the ailerons were used coarsely and, most seriously, the vertical tail surface was of inadequate area. The result was an aircraft that, although quite safe under normal conditions, could rapidly get out of control under certain flight regimes." More info: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Express
  • State Library of New South Wales said:
    Yes, Qantas has even lost lives, but they have never lost the life of anyone flying in one of their jet aircraft, hence the safety reputation. The last fatal crash (2 crew, 19 passengers) was a Constellation, Mauritius, 1960.
  • Chris Keating said:
    In fact they've lost over 60 lives (most of the fatal accidents are detailed in Hudson Fysh's "Qantas Rising"), but try telling people that and out comes the old "Qantas has never had any fatal accidents" furphy... And according to Wikipedia (which is never wrong..), the 1960 Connie crash wasn't a fatal - last I know of was a DHA-3 Drover which went into the sea off New Guinea on 16 July 1951, with the loss of seven lives...
  • State Library of New South Wales said:
    Whoops, sorry Dr Keats! Quite right, there were no fatalities in the 1960 crash. "During takeoff from runway 13, engine number 3 lost power just before reaching the V1 speed of 115 knots. The captain pulled off the power, braked hard, and pulled selected reverse thrust. The aircraft however, did not decelerate as expected. The flight engineer feathered the number 3 engine and pulled its emergency shut-off valve. The Super Constellation, named "Southern Wave", could not be brought to a stop on the remaining runway and overran the runway at a speed of 40 knots. The airplane bounced over a low embankment, crashed into a gulley and caught fire." Reference: Aviation Safety Network online But what airport has a no. 13 runway!!!! There were fatal accidents, (including one Short Empire Flying Boat shot down in 1942 by the Japanese), from 1927 - 1951. They were relatively few compared to most airlines and involved relatively unsophisticated aircraft. All were in Australia, Papua New Guinea or the Indian Ocean. Reference: Qantas accidents in Wikipedia
  • Benetta Anthony said:
    Really interesting pic - Also has that high dynamic range look to it. How did you create the image? Singapore Ecommerce Software.

Illustrated front cover from The Queenslander annual, November 4, 1936

  • 1 older comment, and then…
  • beachcomber australia said:
    State Library of Queensland Ahem! 4 engines (not 2).

    The same biplane VH-USC, a de Havilland DH 86, features in this early QANTAS advert -

  • capitan flickr said:
    BELLA FOTO!!!



    Unisciti a noi e postala in ORGOGLIO ITALIANO