ussalabamabb8

The First Brigade, including the 96th Bombardment Squadron and the 49th Pursuit Squadron, commanded by Major Henry J. F. Miller, had been sent to Langley Field, Virginia by train to take part in Naval ordnance tests between the Air Service and the Navy to be held in the vicinity of Langley Field from June 20 to July 21, 1921. During this practice bombing exercise, they sank the German battleship Ostfriesland on July 21.

Battleship USS Alabama (BB-08). Used for an extensive period as a training vessel for Naval Militias: " Alabama was placed in reserve at New York on 3 November 1908. Though she remained inactive at New York, the battleship was not decommissioned until 17 August 1909. The warship underwent an extensive overhaul that lasted until the early part of 1 912. On 17 April 1912, she was placed in commission, second reserve, at New York, Comdr. Charles F. Preston in command. At that point, she became an element of the newly established Atlantic Reserve Fleet. According to that concept, the Navy organize d a unit that comprised nine of the older battleships as well as Brooklyn (Armored Cruiser No. 3), Columbia (Cruiser No. 12), and Minneapolis (Cruiser No. 13) for the purpose of keeping those ships constantly read for active servi ce using the fiscal expedient of severely reduced complements that could be filled out rapidly by naval militiamen and volunteers in an emergency. The unit as a whole possessed enough officers and men to take two or three of the ships to sea on a rota ting basis to test their material readiness and to exercise the sailors at drill. Alabama was placed in full commission on 25 July 1912 and operated with the Atlantic Fleet off the New England coast through the summer. She was returned to reserve status-in commission, first reserve-at New York on 10 September 1912. Late in t he spring of 1913, the Navy added a new dimension to the concept of the Atlantic Reserve Fleet by having the warships of that unit embark detachments of the various state naval militias for training afloat in a manner similar in many respects to the c ontemporary Navy's selected reserve program. During the summer of 1913, Alabama cruised along the east coast and made two round-trip voyages to Bermuda to train naval militiamen from Maryland, the District of Columbia, New York, Rhode Island, M aine, North Carolina, and Indiana. She ended her last training cruise of the year at Philadelphia on 2 September. The battleship was placed in ordinary on 31 October 1913 and in reserve on 1 July 1914" ref. (http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/battlesh/bb8.htm )

Here is an article from Wikipedia about the USS Alabama (BB-8) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Alabama_(BB-8)

This may not be the Alabama. It may be the Wisconsin BB-9.

We work with glass negatives occasionally at my work. It never fails to utterly amaze me that something so old can make such a fine image to this day. And that in turn always leads me to wonder about the permanence of the images we are making today. This is amazing.

See the Naval Historical Center page on Alabama. In particular, this image (#NH 57753) shows the same ship viewed from the port side at, apparently, the same event--note the number 9 on the banner and the canopy and large US flag at the rear. The caption on that photo says: "Off New York City, during the October 1912 Naval Review." That sounds like the date for this series of photos, perhaps. Why the number 9? Perhaps it is misidentified, but if so, it would seem the photo at the Naval Historical Center is as well. Note that this photo (linked from this page) shows Michigan (BB-27) at the October 1912 review in New York, and Michigan has a banner with the number 17. (So the banner does not appear to correspond to the ship's designation.) Perhaps the banner was some particular number for the event, keyed to a program or something like that? Note added: The Wikipedia article on Naval Review gives details of the event: "14 October 1912, North River, ships including USS Delaware (BB-28) and USS E-1 (SS-24) passed before the President (Taft) and the Secretary of the Navy George von L. Meyer." The date is also given as 14 October 1912 in this article from the New York Times, February 19, 1914.

This list: www.geocities.com/scs028a/1912List.html suggests that both vessels were present at the review.