parle

2 photos tagged parle, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

2
1910

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged parle:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was January 2008.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

"Portrait Parle" Class, Paris (LOC)

  • frapit said:
    It says 'Formulaire du portrait parlé'. Portrait parlé, aka Bertillon system, first scientific method of criminal identification, developed by the French criminologist Alphonse Bertillon (1853-1914). The system, based on the classification of skeletal and other body measurements and characteristics, was officially adopted in France in 1888 and soon after in other countries. Fingerprinting, added later as a supplementary measure, has largely replaced the system
  • So_P said:
    "cav" is for "concave" "vex" for "convexe" r I think for "right" "busk" for "busqué"= aquiline
  • Pete (LOC P&P) said:
    Thanks Wystan. We'll update the title with the correct spelling.
  • Wystan said:
    Another Bain/LOC photo of the Bertillon "Portrait Parle" class:

Portrait Parle class, France (LOC)

  • 4 older comments, and then…
  • skillful north said:
    anyone read French and know what this is about?
  • frapit said:
    It says 'Formulaire du portrait parlé'. Portrait parlé, aka Bertillon system, first scientific method of criminal identification, developed by the French criminologist Alphonse Bertillon (1853-1914). The system, based on the classification of skeletal and other body measurements and characteristics, was officially adopted in France in 1888 and soon after in other countries. Fingerprinting, added later as a supplementary measure, has largely replaced the system
  • skillful north said:
    THANKS. Was it a racist thing?
  • Abi Sutherland said:
    No, it wasn't a racist thing. It was an attempt to identify people uniquely, the same way that fingerprints do. Instead of being fingerprinted, arrested criminals were measured in a number of specific ways, on the theory that that combination of measurements was unique to them. It failed mostly because it required a lot of training to get the measurements right, and because fingerprinting came in shortly after it was invented. It also had the disadvantage that it wasn't usable in all the ways a fingerprint is. No one leaves a complete set of Bertillon measurements at a crime scene!
  • skillful north said:
    Thanks for the clarification.