ussconnecticutbb18

10 photos tagged ussconnecticutbb18, from 2 members of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

6
1908
1912

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged ussconnecticutbb18:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was May 2012.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

CONNECTICUT U.S.N. saluting MAYFLOWER (LOC)

from The Library of Congress

  • cotinis said:
    The Mayflower, was the Presidential Yacht, PY-1 (see Wikipedia).
  • Kimberly Caldwell Photography said:
    Some of my relatives came over on the Mayflower :)

Visitors on board the CONNECTICUT 10/11 (LOC)

from The Library of Congress

  • cotinis said:
    Seems the "10/11" might refer to October 11. Perhaps this was just before the naval review in New York on 14 October 1912, where a couple of other photos of warships from the Bain collection were taken. Perhaps! (Another commenter on this series mentioned a similar review in October 1911.)
  • B-59 said:
    The original caption is 10/27/11. The warships were assembled for the great naval review on Thursday, November 2, 1911, s. The evening world., October 28, 1911, Final Edition, Image 1 chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030193/1911-10-28/ed-...
  • Anne (LOC P&P) said:
    B-59: Thanks for pointing out the complete date. We will fix this next time we update.

CONNECTICUT Saluting (LOC)

from The Library of Congress

  • 1 older comment, and then…
  • Harry Angstrom said:
    Article from Wikipedia is here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Connecticut_(BB-18) although this photo has differences from the other photo of the Connecticut, the bow and tower structures, for example.
  • JSleeper said:
    What was the purpose of those cage masts? They seem to be tall enough to make a target out of the ship.
  • William Stoutenburgh said:
    No radar so lookouts had to be high to see other ships and where the shots landed for fire control. Less wind hamper and visibility with the cages. My opinion with no research.
  • William Stoutenburgh said:
    Also more strength to hold up the platforms.
  • perfgeek said:
    From the date, and the proximity to other photos, looks like this was part of the 1912 fleet review: www.geocities.com/scs028a/1912List.html Indeed though the cage masts look rather different than the towers in the other photos. However, this link: www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-c/bb18.htm suggests that she had her masts altered ca 1908/1909 which would have been in time for this picture.