p38s

17 photos tagged p38s, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

17
2012

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged p38s:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was October 2012.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

Fighter Group; 7th Air Force; 36th; P-38s

  • ats42 said:
    That's P-38J.
  • Gerry Asher said:
    36th Fighter Squadron "Flying Fiends," 8th FG.

Fighter Group; 7th Air Force; 36th; P-38s

  • ats42 said:
    P-38H "Slightly Dangerous" from 8th FG, previously assigned to 432nd FS/475th FG coded with #159 and flown by Capt. Arthur L. Peregoy.
  • Gerry Asher said:
    Serial number 42-66750; last two digits of Lockheed construction number (1261) just visible behind the pinup's shoulder, the bird Peregoy was flying when he downed a "Zeke" on 2 November 1943.

Bombardment Group ; 8th Air Force; 13th Squadron; P-38s

  • ats42 said:
    Probably P-38 of the 347th FG close to the end of war.
  • Gerry Asher said:
    I may be grabbing at straws... the number stencilled on the panel adjacent to the artist's nape appears to read "25827." I don't know if Lockheed - or the assigned unit - was ever in the habit of 'tagging' panels to particular aircraft, but this may be P-38L serial 44-25827.
  • ats42 said:
    May be or not, because this stenciling is unusual and can not to be compared to others photos of P-38's from this period. This may to be an oldest version of P-38 too (i.e. J-25) because doesn't have any signs of an adhesive tape ( they were permanently washed out during a service) and had a serious damage on the nose, maybe in combat. Another P-38 in this set is nearly a factory fresh P-38L-5 with very good visible signs of adhesive tape. Because a photographer from an another unit did both photos probably at one time then these both P-38's probably were assigned to the unit in two different periods, but this is just a speculation ;-)
  • ats42 said:
    Looking at this from a different point is worth to say, that it can to be a serial number painted especially in the unit because an original was obscured. The log books of the pilots and of the units usualy use serial numbers, not code markings or an individual names and this serial was helpful for the crew while reporting and maintenance.
  • timothy bottoms said:
    Shouldn't this be labeled 13th AF? Note patch on sleeve.