louisheld

3 photos tagged louisheld, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.

When were these photos taken?

3
2004

 

Where were these photos tagged?

None of these photos are geotagged.

Tags that often appear on the same photos:

Members using this tag

Photos

Photos tagged louisheld:

Loading photos…

See more on flickr.com →

Recent uploads

The last upload was October 2009.

Conversations

Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these photos:

[Franz Liszt in his home]

  • Pixel Wrangler said:
    This is a wonderful photograph – rich in detail and personality! Liszt's Liebesträume ("A Dream of Love") – performed yesterday on a magnificent world stage in Oslo – is still playing in my mind, which makes this portrait all-the-more intimate and compelling. Louis Held, the photographer, was a protégé of Franz Liszt [1] – that must have been fun and amazing!  
  • Webrarian said:
    Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Classical Composers, and we'd love to have this added to the group!
  • Bergen Public Library Norway said:
    @Pixel Wrangler: thanks for the info on Held.
  • Poised Winter said:
    Beautiful Photo, taken in 1872 or later. Louis Held met him in 1872 and studied with him in Weimar.

[Franz Liszt portrait]

  • Ambiguous Apparel said:
    The date, ca. 1830, is presumably based on the visible appareance and the assumed age of Liszt (b. 1811). Maybe this is correct. I have no insight in the source of this estimation, and im not qualified to compare this with other lithos showing Liszt at an age of ca. 19 years. The lithography is created at a later date. It is signed by Josef Kriehuber, lithographer from Vienna, with the year 1846. The publiction in form of this postcard must also be from a later date for two reasons. First, In 1846 the term Hofphotograph (court photographer) wasnt established. Second, the publisher Louis Held was born 1851. He opened his first studio in 1876 in Liegnitz (today: Legnica) and moved to Weimar in 1882. I dont know when he acclaimed the title Hofphotograph, but he lost the title in 1905. This means the publication is from between 1882+X and 1905.