sherlocknet:tag=letter
12,199 illustrations tagged sherlocknet:tag=letter, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.
When were these illustrations taken?
Where were these illustrations tagged?
None of these illustrations are geotagged.
Related tags
Tags that often appear on the same illustrations:
- bldigital
- publicdomain
- mechanicalcurator
- vol0
- large
- small
- pubplacelondon
- sherlocknet:tag=london
- sherlocknet:tag=john
- sherlocknet:category=text
- sherlocknet:category=organism
- sherlocknet:tag=friend
- sherlocknet:tag=general
- sherlocknet:tag=nature
- sherlocknet:category=seals
- sherlocknet:tag=place
- sherlocknet:tag=hand
- sherlocknet:tag=england
- sherlocknet:tag=year
- sherlocknet:tag=house
- sherlocknet:tag=france
- sherlocknet:tag=history
- sherlocknet:tag=name
- sherlocknet:tag=heart
Members using this tag
Illustrations
A selection of illustrations tagged sherlocknet:tag=letter:
Loading illustrations…
Recent uploads
The last upload was November 2018.
British Library digitised image from page 5 of "Never-for ever [A novel.]" from British Library uploaded November 2018
British Library digitised image from page 147 of "North Sea pilot" from British Library uploaded October 2018
British Library digitised image from page 235 of "He knew he was right" from British Library uploaded October 2018
British Library digitised image from page 51 of "The History of Norway [With maps.]" from British Library uploaded October 2018
Conversations
Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these illustrations:
British Library digitised image from page 193 of "Moko; or, Maori Tattooing ... With ... illustrations, etc"
from British Library
- Victoria Leachman said:
British Library digitised image from page 10 of "Orllie-Antoine Ier, Roi d'Araucanie ... son avénement au trône et sa captivité au Chili, rélation écrite par luimême"
from British Library
-
Duncan_and_Gladys said:
Caption: Orllie-Antoine Ier.
British Library digitised image from page 297 of "The Story of Chicago. (Vol. II. by J. Kirkland and C. Kirkland, 1894.)"
from British Library
-
Ferenc Cságoly said:
date of publishing is incorrect. maybe 1902?