pubplacechicago
13,458 illustrations tagged pubplacechicago, from 1 member of Flickr Commons.
When were these illustrations taken?
Where were these illustrations tagged?
None of these illustrations are geotagged.
Related tags
Tags that often appear on the same illustrations:
- bldigital
- publicdomain
- mechanicalcurator
- small
- vol0
- sherlocknet:tag=john
- sherlocknet:tag=history
- sherlocknet:tag=year
- sherlocknet:tag=william
- sherlocknet:tag=house
- sherlocknet:tag=land
- sherlocknet:tag=office
- date1880
- sherlocknet:tag=county
- sherlocknet:category=organism
- sherlocknet:category=decorations
- date1802
- sysnum001975928
- kirklandjoseph
- imagesfrombook001975928
- sherlocknet:tag=general
- large
- sherlocknet:tag=early
- sherlocknet:tag=george
Members using this tag
Illustrations
A selection of illustrations tagged pubplacechicago:
Loading illustrations…
Recent uploads
The last upload was November 2018.
British Library digitised image from page 305 of "The history of Linn County, Iowa. ... Illustrated" from British Library uploaded November 2018
British Library digitised image from page 73 of "The History of Clark County, Ohio ... Illustrated" from British Library uploaded November 2018
British Library digitised image from page 104 of "History of Northern Wisconsin. ... Illustrated" from British Library uploaded November 2018
Conversations
Here’s a selection of the conversations happening on these illustrations:
British Library digitised image from page 222 of "John L. Stoddard's Lectures [on his travels] . Illustrated ... with views of the worlds famous places and people, etc"
from British Library
- Avy Andrews said:
British Library digitised image from page 263 of "John L. Stoddard's Lectures [on his travels] . Illustrated ... with views of the worlds famous places and people, etc"
from British Library
-
poonvincent said:
the Parsee Cemetery, Happy Valley
British Library digitised image from page 297 of "The Story of Chicago. (Vol. II. by J. Kirkland and C. Kirkland, 1894.)"
from British Library
-
Ferenc Cságoly said:
date of publishing is incorrect. maybe 1902?